— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) January 31, 2022
— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) April 15, 2020
お仕置きの後、倒れた生徒がいるようで、そのあとの展開も気になります。次の @YouTube 再生リストに動画を追加しました: https://t.co/rGGW7pRrMv Spanking Korea girl | Teacher and student— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) 2017年5月21日
次の @YouTube 再生リストに動画を追加しました: https://t.co/ITffbFqmhm [HOT] Spanking the Korean hot girl 01— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) 2016年11月20日
次の @YouTube 再生リストに動画を追加しました: https://t.co/FphMXEzi17 [HOT] Spanking the Korean hot girl 02— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) 2016年11月20日
次の @YouTube 再生リストに動画を追加しました: https://t.co/4f0KYOgj7b [HOT] Spanking the Korean hot girl 03— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) 2016年11月20日
次の @YouTube 再生リストに動画を追加しました: https://t.co/C0aUwtVjSM [HOT] Spanking the Korean hot girl 04— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) 2016年11月20日
次の @YouTube 再生リストに動画を追加しました: https://t.co/9etevYNIEe [HOT] Spanking the Korean hot girl 05— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) 2016年11月20日
次の @YouTube 再生リストに動画を追加しました: https://t.co/dvoH1tXP7u [HOT] Spanking the Korean hot girl 06— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) 2016年11月20日
次の @YouTube 再生リストに動画を追加しました: https://t.co/FRymgfVF0D [HOT] Spanking the Korean hot girl 07— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) 2016年11月20日
次の @YouTube 再生リストに動画を追加しました: https://t.co/sSl9o2pMX0 Korea SPANKING SCULACCIATE FESSÉE NALGADAS
— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) 2016, 1月 1
次の @YouTube 再生リストに動画を追加しました: https://t.co/X38sJrJOAg Korean spanking
— ryu_spanking (@ryu_spanking) 2015, 11月 15
なんで水をかけるのかは知りませんけど、本当は気絶するくらいに痛いのかもしれません。
Since September when the Seoul education authorities announced a plan to ban corporal punishment at primary and secondary schools, verbal abuses by students against their teachers have made headlines.
It was the first time for the city education office to prevent schools from punishing students physically, although the central government stipulates that teachers need to refrain from physically punishing pupils.
Kim also referred to the survey results of citizens on corporal punishment. “In a recent survey by a local TV station, which was conducted after the Seoul education office started to ban corporal punishment at schools, 83.6 percent of respondents said they oppose the ban on corporal punishment,” he said.
“The British government is also considering revising its ‘No touch’ (students) policy, as many teachers are suffering from attacks by students. The Seoul education office adopted a policy which the British education ministry already failed to implement.”
The number of middle school students who were disciplined for misbehavior against their teachers stood at 162 in Seoul during the September-December semester, up from 117 in the same period the previous year. For high schoolers, the figure, however, fell to 80 from 86 a year earlier.
By Kang Shin-who
Since September when the Seoul education authorities announced a plan to ban corporal punishment at primary and secondary schools, verbal abuses by students against their teachers have made headlines.
It’s too early to say that the ban on physical punishment — spearheaded by Kwak No-hyun, superintendent of Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education — increased the cases of infringement of teachers’ authority in the classroom, analysts and educators said.
Despite a recent spike in the reports of students’ rebelling against teachers, the Seoul education office’s statistics show that there have been no marked increase in cases of violence or use of abusive language against teachers in the second half of the year.
The number of middle school students who were disciplined for misbehavior against their teachers stood at 162 in Seoul during the September-December semester, up from 117 in the same period the previous year. For high schoolers, the figure, however, fell to 80 from 86 a year earlier.
The Korean Teachers and Educational Worker’s Union (KTU) believes it is premature to evaluate the policy to ban physical chastisement.
“It has been only two months since the ban on corporal punishment was introduced. We need more time before making a conclusion,” said Eum Min-yong, spokesman of KTU. “Many conservative groups are trying to mislead citizens into believing that recent cases of attacks on teachers have been sparked by the ban on corporal punishment. But it’s not true.”
The ban on corporal punishment, one of the most controversial issues that highlighted the second half of the year, has been trumpeted by Seoul City’s top educator Kwak.
It was the first time for the city education office to prevent schools from punishing students physically, although the central government stipulates that teachers need to refrain from physically punishing pupils.
Schools in Gyeonggi Province, headed by another liberal educator Kim Sang-gon, will also ban all forms of physical discipline.
Too early to ban?
Conservative groups criticized liberal educators for having hastily pushed forward the ban.
The conservative Korean Federation of Teachers’ Association (KFTA), the largest teachers’ group, called for the city’s education office to come up with alternative tools to control unruly students, and it admits that corporal punishment should disappear.
“First, there should be measures to immediately curb those who disturb other students from studying. Also, the education authorities should devise ways to protect teachers’ rights,” said Kim Dong-seok, spokesman of the KFTA.
Kim also referred to the survey results of citizens on corporal punishment. “In a recent survey by a local TV station, which was conducted after the Seoul education office started to ban corporal punishment at schools, 83.6 percent of respondents said they oppose the ban on corporal punishment,” he said.
“The British government is also considering revising its ‘No touch’ (students) policy, as many teachers are suffering from attacks by students. The Seoul education office adopted a policy which the British education ministry already failed to implement.”
Moreover, a series of ugly cases where students assaulted or harassed female teachers in the classroom have stoked skepticism of the ban. Some teachers blamed the education office, saying students misunderstand and think that they gained greater freedom as teachers are banned from punishing them.
Lack of substitute
Experts point out that many schools lack a substitute method to maintain discipline and the Seoul education office should introduce more realistic measures to cope with the change.
“I believe hitting students for bad behavior should disappear in principle, but the Seoul education office’s policy measures seem too idealized to be adopted practically,” said Kim Hyun-jin, an education professor at Kookmin University in Seoul.
The education expert suggested that each school needs to be authorized to arrange its own way to control students, instead of being governed by the city or provincial education office.
“I think it’s better for an individual school operation committee consisting of parents and teachers to decide on the disciplining measures for their children attending that school,” he said.
担任教師にお尻を殴られた小学校2学年女子学生写真がオンラインに広がって論議が広がっている。
被害学生が自身のおい（めい）と主張したあるネチズンは去る24日ポータルサイト掲示板に文と共に醜くアザができた子供のお尻写真を公開した。 この文と写真は28日午前現在の色々なポータルサイト掲示板に広がってネチズンらの注目を引いている。
このネチズンは"担任先生が授業時間に図形一つ色塗り間違ったと小学校2学年女の子お尻を27代も殴った"としながら"子供が間違ったと祈って哀願するのにも引っ張って行って殴ったといったよ"として過剰体罰を非難した。
彼は担任先生と学校側の理解することはできない解明に対しても悔しさを放った。
彼は"問題の担任は子供たちを殴った後'愛して殴ることだ。 ご両親には話すな'で洗脳教育までさせるといったよ"としながら"学校教頭は被害写真を見た後'子供皮膚が弱いようだ'というやめるほどであった"と明らかにした。
問題を提起したネチズンによれば該当教師は学校に提出した経過書を通じて"子供が18個試験問題中17個を間違いだ。 違った問題を宿題でさせたがしてこなかったし、してこない場合ある問題党一代ずつ体罰を約束した"と主張して"宿題をしてこなかった理由を尋ねる過程で返事をしなくて追加で10代をさらに体罰した"と明らかにした。
学校側やはり言論とのインタビューで学生両親に十分な謝罪をしたと主張した。
問題の写真と文を見たネチズンらは該当教師の強力な処罰と学校側の公開謝罪を要求してきた。
20代後半女性で知らされた問題の担任教師は今回の体罰事件前にも自身が引き受けた学級男の子に100台余りに近い体罰をしたことでも知らされた。